Recession Indicators Go Off, Is the Housing Market Safe?

Dave:
Hey friends, if you ted into our last episode, you heard a friendly debate between the panelists and myself about whether or not we’re in a recession and we were sort of talking about this large higher level economic discussion, but we didn’t really get into whether or not the housing market would decline, and that’s honestly a different question. Recession and housing market, sometimes they move in the same direction, sometimes they actually move in opposite directions. So today I’m actually going to share with you a special crossover episode. This aired originally on the BiggerPockets Real Estate podcast where myself, James from this podcast and Jay Scott, who you may know from the BiggerPockets iverse, debated whether or not we are likely to see a housing market crash. But we also did some scenario planning about if the market crashed, what would you do? What would have to happen, first of all to make the market crash?

Dave:
And how would you react if prices started to go down in a pretty significant ways? And we had that conversation and loved it so much that we’re going to bring it here to on the market. And what we’re going to talk about is the history of the market and how’s today’s conditions compare to previous recessions, the important distinctions between an economic recession and a housing market crash, and a new theoretical graph from J Scott, which is always interesting and will probably change the way you think about the economy. So today we’re going to bring that conversation to you.

Dave:
But

Dave:
Before we do that, I wanted to tell you a little bit about what actually happened in 2008 to grod our conversation. To provide a little bit of context and help you fully derstand the conversation that Jay James and I are going to have. In 2008, the world witnessed one of the most significant financial crises in modern history, and it all started with the housing market bubble. Throughout the early two thousands, banks issued risky mortgages to many borrowers who couldn’t afford them and maybe didn’t have the qualifying credit. These were called subprime mortgages, and they were packa and sold to investors in what are called mortgage backed securities. Meanwhile, banks and financial institutions were heavily leveraging these securities and were betting on the market to remain stable. However, things chan in 2007 when housing prices began to decline and derqualified homeowners began to defaulting on their mortgages.

Dave:
This created a sort of domino effect and the value of these mortgage backed securities plummeted. This led to Lehman Brothers, which at the time was one of the largest financial institutions in the world to file for bankruptcy, which in turn sent even more shockwaves and panic throughout the entire global financial system. Eventually, the government intervened. They provided bailouts and stimulus packages to help stabilize the economy. However, many average Americans, investors, and even large financial institutions were left in dire financial situations, some losing everything. This event and its aftermath was possibly the most significant event in the housing market and the real estate investing industry. In a century or maybe in American history, we saw the biggest decline in home prices we’ve ever seen, or at least as far back as we have data. And we saw a record number of foreclosures. And while this was of course, a terrible event for Americans and the American economy, in retrospect, it also created some really ique opportities in the housing market.

Dave:
And when we fast forward to today, there are a lot of widespread fears of another market crash. We have high interest rates, we have low affordability, persistent inflation and turmoil in the commercial real estate market, which are all rightfully fueling some of these fears. So today we’re going to explore the idea of another crash. Will it happen again? What would it look like? And if it does happen, how should you react to discuss this, let’s bring on Jay Scott and James Sta. Jay and James, welcome to the BiggerPockets Real Estate Podcast. Thank you both for being here. Jay, I appreciate you being back on. How many times you been on this podcast?

J:
I lost cot

Dave:
One of the, oh, the OGs

J:
Just keep having me back in one day. We can call it my hdredth episode and celebrate.

Dave:
All right, it’s probably coming up there. James, thanks for being here. I know you literally just moved your whole family across the cotry this weekend, so I appreciate you taking the time to podcast with us from what looks like a closet or some sort of weird prison cell that you’re at right now.

James:
We are in the wine room, actually, it’s the only place I could get this house not to echo. So we’re going from a yacht to a wine room. I don’t know if that’s a trade

Dave:
Up. And knowing you since you don’t drink, it’s empty. So it’s a perfect place to

James:
Podcast. I’m Burton, it’s going to be Mike Booth.

Dave:
Alright, well let’s get into what’s going on in the market today because we planned this show a couple of weeks ago to talk about a potential crash and what happens. And we’re still going to get into that, but there’s been a lot of news, economic news recently that is going to inform this conversation. So Jay, could you just give us a summary of what’s happened in the macroeconomic climate in the last couple of weeks? And just for everyone’s reference, we’re recording this first week of August.

J:
Yeah, so we’re on Monday, August 5th right now. And I think the big piece of news that has come out recently that’s kind of driving the markets is that employment data for July was released a few days ago, and that data indicated that employment had crossed this kind of scary threshold that we call the som rule. And the som rule is just a rule made up by an economist named Claudia Sam who theorized, and it’s been proven true that if the employment rate increases too high above the lowest point over the last 12 months, it’s one of the single best predictors of a recession. And as of three days ago, as of Friday, August 2nd, employment data indicated that according to her rule, we are now in a recession. Now whether that actually plays out or not, I don’t know, but what we saw was a steep stock market drop on Friday. We’re seeing a big drop in the market today, Monday the fifth. Don’t know what’s happened in the week and a half before this episode airs, but presumably the market is in a much more fragile point today than it was even a few weeks ago. And so a lot of people starting to get concerned, a lot of people talking about is this the beginning of a recession?

Dave:
Thanks for the summary, Jay. That is a very good and concise way to explain that the broader economic picture has darkened a little bit over the last couple of weeks. And just for everyone to know, Jay said that this is an indicator of a recession. We fortately don’t ever know officially if we are in a recession or not til it’s already started. This is the way the government has decided that it works, is that a bch of academics get together and retroactively tell us that a recession started couple months ago and then they tell us that it ended a couple months after it ended. So that leaves us to interpret the realtime data and try and derstand if we are in a recession. So that’s what we’re trying to get at today. James, I know you follow the market pretty closely. Did this news spook you at all or change your thinking about investing at all?

James:
No, I feel like everything’s on such a two month delay when we hear reporting is because two months ago we could start to feel this going on in the backgrod. And one thing I’ve learned over the last five, 10 years is don’t pay attention to the headlines all the time. It’s what are you feeling? And if you’re actively investing, whether it’s the stock market, real estate, whatever it is, you can feel the shift inventory stacking things are slowing down and we could kind of feel it. So I was just kind of waiting for the headlines. I actually think the headlines on real estate are coming in like 30 days. Inventory has exploded and all these things, but this is what the Fed has been trying to do. So I don’t know why people are starting to react. We’ve actually been waiting for this to happen so we can get some interest rate relief. And so it was to be expected. It just honestly came a lot later than I was thinking it was going to come. That’s

Dave:
A really good point. And there is a lag with all economic data. You mentioned something about inventory though, which is going to be sort of central to the rest of our conversation about a potential crash. It is already up 23% year over year as of the last reading. James, given that you have such a good pulse on the market, and I am not trying to joke here, but in many ways you probably feel this stuff before the headlines. Do you think inventory has gone up even more than that headline number that we’ve already seen?

James:
I do. I mean I feel like in our local markets, inventory’s probably up 30 to 40% in the last 60 days. But that’s also because we are working off no baseline. The inventory was non-existent. We were below a month’s supply 90 days ago. And the thing I have learned is don’t be so reactionary when things like this happened, right? Markets go up and down and you have to, when you start to feel it differently, you want to adjust your numbers differently. I can tell you I’ve bought less houses the last 60 days, but that doesn’t mean that things aren’t selling. We also just sold one of our most expensive flips that was on market for 90 days. We didn’t touch price and we sold it for like 2% der list. And so I think a lot of it is inventory increasing, but you just need to be patient because we are selling everything right now and we’re still selling them for above performa. You want be cautious but you don’t want to get cold feet.

Dave:
Alright, so we’re keeping a level head as we react to the latest employment news, but a recession in the overall economy is not the same thing as a real estate slump. So when we come back, we’ll break down how we might see real estate act in these conditions stick arod. Welcome back to the BiggerPockets podcast. Now Jay, I’m really glad we have you here. You’ve literally wrote a book about recession proof real estate investing. So with this increased risk of recession, can you give us a little bit of a primer on how real estate tends to react in a recession if there is a pattern at all?

J:
And so luckily we have 34, 35, 36 depending on what you think has happened in the last couple of years, recessions over the last 160 years where we can look back and say what has historically occurred And well obviously we can’t be certain that history is going to repeat itself. I’m a big believer that the best predictor of the future is what’s happened in the past. And the reality is that of those, let’s call ’em 35 recessions that we’ve seen over the last 160 years, 34 of them had a negligible if any impact on real estate values. Obviously there was one big recession where we saw real estate values take a huge hit, and that was back in 2008 and after 2008. And so the question is what was different about 2008? And are we seeing those signs today? Are we likely to see the same conditions we saw in 2008 result in a housing crash like we saw in 2008 or the conditions today more similar to the other 34 recessions where we didn’t see a housing crash?

J:
And so if we look back at 2008, a couple of the things that drove the housing crash in 2008, number one, the thing that caused the recession were fdamental issues in the housing market. Fdamental issues with lending, fdamental issues with these things called mortgage backed securities. So 2008 was fdamentally a real estate driven recession. Today in theory, we don’t have those same issues. We don’t have issues with lending, we’re not seeing the same banking issues. You could argue we’re seeing some banking issues, but not like we saw in 2008. We’re not seeing the same issues with mortgage backed securities. So in that respect, today’s very different than 2008. Now the one way today is very similar to 2008 was that back leading up to 2008 from 2001, 2002 through 2006, we saw real estate values move well above the long-term trend. We saw real estate values way above where we should have expected them to be based on the trend line that we had seen for the a hdred years previous.

J:
Today we’re seeing the same thing over the last three, four or five years, real estate values have just spiked well above that trend line. And so it does lead us to ask the question, are we necessarily going to see real estate values kind of fall back to that trend line? Are we going to see a crash back to that long-term historic trend line or not? And so I think we can talk about that, but at the end of the day, I don’t think that historically recessions have a big impact on real estate. I don’t think that today’s current environment is analogous to 2008 except in the one respect that real estate values are exceedingly high given historic terms.

Dave:
Fantastic summary, Jay. Thank you. And I know that this is not always intuitive to people, it’s a question at least I get a lot, is people assume recession equals housing price decline. And I think that’s particularly true of people who are maybe millennials or yoger because there was this sort of defining recession in our lifetime and it’s what we all remember, at least I could speak for myself, I certainly remember other recessions, but that was the big one and it sort of leaves the biggest im on people’s assumptions about what’s going to happen in the future. And before I jump over to you James, I also want to add Jay, that in addition to housing prices, rent also doesn’t from my derstanding, decline during recessions necessarily. I think it declined a little bit during the great recession, but similar trend where recession does not necessarily mean price declines at rent. So for James, you were arod in 2008, you felt the r up to that, Jay provided some of the data, but does this feel similar to you or different? James?

James:
I feel like this is different because we’ve all been waiting for it for 12 months. In 2008, I was a yoger investor, I was 24, 25, and we had just invested all of our money in our business and flips and I wasn’t really paying attention to the market. There wasn’t all these cool BiggerPockets podcasts back then. It was kind of like read the news, see what’s in there. And it was almost felt like a right hook out of nowhere. It was like once they annoced subprime mortgages were being eliminated and the HELOCs and access to banking was gone, it was like the lights went out and it was in a free fall. I don’t feel like we’re in that because everyone’s been kind of preparing. But now I feel like because the market didn’t, people got very aggressive again and they’re really aggressive. I feel like if you stuck to your core derwriting, it’s going to be a lot different in today’s age.

James:
I don’t see us going into a massive free fall. There’s still a big housing shortage. People still need places to live and there’s still a lot of institutional also out there buying property. And there’s so many different types of buyers in the market that aren’t affected by banking as much as it was back then. I don’t think this is going to be the same thing. And that’s the issue. The thing I’ve learned from all our little dips and downturns is they’re all different and they all have different reactions. And instead of trying to go, oh, I need a plan for a market crash and then I’m going to buy up all the real estate aid, which I wouldn’t be opposed to, I kind of have prepared myself for that. We go on a free fall, I will go on a buying spree, but I don’t think that’s going to happen. And really what you have to do is just kind of make adjustments of what is the asset type that you’re looking for, how do you make it safer and then stick to your core numbers of hey, this is what I need to buy at and don’t pack the performance like people have been doing the last four years. Performance are not supposed to be packed, they’re supposed to be on the now. James,

Dave:
Can you just explain that for a minute? So what does that mean packing a performa and what do you recommend people do instead?

James:
Well, packing a performa is when people take the last 12 to 24 months and they see what’s happened and they anticipate the same growth. And what we like to do is look at historical growth. Like if we’re buying a flip packing up, forma would be going, Hey, this market has appreciated at 10% over the last 12 months. I’m going to forecast that into my whole times or rents have climbed at 10%, I’m going to forecast that in that they’re going to continue this climb. But if you stick with historicals, it’s a lot safer. The first thing is I never put appreciation in my proforma. We are buying on the now, that is it. We don’t anticipate that we are going to sell this property for more rent growth. You have to put into your performance. But we use 20 year averages, not two to three year averages because markets go up and down and you want to go, okay, what is the normal rate for rent growth or whatever the growth’s going to be. And so I feel like if we do go into recession, which I’m not even sold on yet, because every time they say it’s going to happen it and then when they say it’s not going to happen, your lights are going to get knocked out. But what you can do is just be cautious and just buy on the now, buy on historicals, not the last 24. Those are not real numbers. And then look at buying those properties.

Dave:
Well it sods like you and Jay both feel similarly that a market crash is likely right now. Jay, do you think the talk of market crash is wishful thinking? I feel like I hear a lot of people say like, oh, what goes up must come down. Or they related to 2008 that we’ve sort of had this outsized growth, but there are fdamentals of supply and demand that are informing what you say. And I agree with a lot of what you’re saying here. So what would have to happen for the market to crash? What fdamentals would need to change?

J:
So before I answer that question, I do want to address one thing you just said, you said is a crash, wishful thinking. The fny thing, the ironic thing even is that I think a lot of people think that if there was a crash, they’d be buying tons of property and they’d be thrilled and everybody would be happy. But the reality is anybody that lived through 2008 knows that your reaction in the moment tends not to be that you see a market crash and instead of thinking, wow, this is a great opportity, what your brain starts to, your fight or flight in your brain starts to think is, oh no, is this the end of the world? Where’s the bottom? Are we ever going to hit the bottom? Is this going to be a 20 year downturn like Japan saw back in the nineties? Is this going to be the next great depression? And people kind of hker down and instead of taking advantage of the opportity, they sit back and they say, this is worse than I ever expected. I’m going to wait,

Dave:
Jay, lemme just respond to that quickly. It’s such a good point. We have a good example of this in the stock market all the time. How many people bought stock in March of 2020 after the stock market crash? I know I didn’t. I sure wish I did. And I would always tell myself, when the stock market goes down, I’ll buy into it. But I was afraid I didn’t know what was going to happen with the world. It had one of the biggest crashes ever and I missed out on it. But if I had just kept dollar cost averaging, I would’ve enjoyed the recovery from that. And I just want to clarify that when I say wishful thinking, obviously people who hold a lot of real estate may not be wishing for that. But I do think we hear a lot of, particularly newer investors or people who want to get into the first time looking at affordability, which is at 40 or lows and saying, man, I need some relief to get into this market. That’s another topic for another show. But that’s sort of what I mean by wishful thinking is that some people think that they can get in based on that. So anyway, back to my other question is what, let’s just talk fdamentals for a second here. What would have to happen and what would need to change for the market to actually crash? And we should probably define crash, let’s call it 10% declines nationwide in home values.

J:
Yeah, so I’m going to kind of not answer that question because

J:
Well, I’ll answer the question, but I think my answer is going to be a little bit different than most people expect because there’s one really important lesson that I learned in 2008 and that’s that the data isn’t necessarily driving the market. So everybody says, well if employment goes to this number, what’s going to happen? And if inflation goes to this number, what’s going to happen? And if interest rates drop to this amot, what’s going to happen at the end of the day? All of those things are important, but they’re less important than one other, much less quantifiable metric. And that’s how much fear is there in the market because at the end of the day, the fdamentals, the data, the numbers are absolutely meaningless relative to how much fear there is in the market. If there’s a lot of fear, it doesn’t matter how good the numbers are and if there’s no fear, it doesn’t matter how bad the numbers are. Fear is what’s going to drive people’s decision making. And at the end of the day, how much fear is what’s going to determine what happens in the stock market, the real estate market and every other asset market there is out

Dave:
There. Jay, I’m surprised to hear you say that because I agree with the stock market side of things that is sort of, it has this intrinsic volatility where people can sell and take money out, but at least to me, what creates stability in the housing work, and I agree it’s not data. Most people other than maybe the three of us don’t look at real estate data all that much. But because real estate as an asset class is mostly people’s housing, I don’t really feel like because they’re afraid they’re all of a sudden going to sell their house for less money than they need. To me, what it comes down to is this idea of forced selling. Is there such a bad recession or are there macroeconomic conditions that mean they can no longer afford their payments? Do you agree with that or disagree?

J:
So again, let me reframe this before I answer that question. And I want to go back to this fear.

Dave:
Jay should have been a politician, man, you’re just doting these questions. I like

James:
That Jay’s asking his own questions, he’s interviewing himself right now.

J:
So I guess the key here is I want to rebut your idea that the data is more important than fear. So think of it this way, imagine a graph, and I like to call this a fear graph. And so imagine a graph where on the horizontal axis is fear from one to 10. Well, let’s look at inventory based on a fear graph. On a level of fear. Today I would argue, or let’s say two weeks ago, I would argue that fear was down near one. Nobody was scared about a market crash, nobody was really too worried about the economy. So we were probably at a one or a two on the fear. Where was inventory? Where has been? It’s been historically very low. And why is that? Because when there’s no fear in the market, sellers aren’t going to sell. Sellers don’t have a reason to give up their 3% mortgages, their 4% mortgages, they don’t have a reason to sell when prices are through the roof and they’d have to go buy something else that is a ridiculous price at a 7% mortgage.

J:
So when fear is very low, transaction volume is going to be very low in today’s environment. Now think of it the other extreme, imagine fear going all the way to eight or nine or 10. At that point, sellers are going to be desperate to sell. They’re going to want to lock in their equity, they’re going to want to get out of their houses before the market crashes. Basically they’re going to be losing their jobs or they’re going to need to sell. But what’s going to be happening on the buyer side, when the buyer side, we’re going to see the same thing we saw in 2008 when fear was at eight, nine or 10. And that’s that nobody wants to buy anybody that was flipping houses. I was flipping houses in 2008. And lemme tell you something, the hardest thing to do in 2008 was to sell that house because there were no buyers and the buyers that were there, they didn’t qualify.

J:
And so as you get to fear at 8, 9, 10, transaction volume dries up as well. Where do you see the most transaction volume when fear is somewhere arod four or five or six? Because that’s where you have a good amot of sellers that are really interested in selling. They may need to sell, they may want to lock in their gains. And that’s where you have the most buyers that aren’t too scared to stop buying at that point. And so if you look at the fear graph for transaction volume, you kind of have this hump so it starts low, goes to a peak and then ends up low. And I think it’s a lot less important what happens with interest rates. I think it’s a lot less important what happens with employment. Obviously all those things contribute, but all those things also contribute to the amot of fear we have. And at the end of the day, I think that is the data point that’s most important.

Dave:
That is very well said Jay. And I actually agree with you on most of it. I want to just say I’m not saying data is more important. I agree the average American doesn’t look at data. I think that’s a very good premise and I’m envisioning this graph now and it makes a lot of sense to me. But the one thing I question is what happens to a regular homeowner when fear hits 10? Because I see your point that they might say, Hey, I want to sell and take my equity out. If it were me, I’d be like, no, I’m going to hker down. I’m just not going to do anything right now. And so I am curious what happens there, but I think that’s a very, very interesting data point that if we could quantify that really well, I guess you can in the stock market at least. But that would be super cool.

J:
Keep in mind that fear is correlated to what’s going on in the real world. So fear at 10 means that employment is probably spiking, people are losing their jobs, people are able to pay their mortgages, people are able to put food on their family’s plates. And so fear at 10 isn’t just people making the decision, do I want to sell or not sell? Fear at 10 is probably due to the fact people are that fearful because they’re in a situation where they’re desperate.

Dave:
We have to take a final break to hear a word from our sponsors. But while we’re away, if you do want to learn more about real estate investing or get more timely information about the housing market, make sure to visit our website, biggerpockets.com. Welcome back to the show. Let’s jump back in with James and Jack.

James:
I do feel like in 2008 though, the sellers were in a different mindset than they are today. And so I feel like when people are looking for this housing crash, do I think transactions will slow down? Yes, but I don’t know if there’s going to be this massive decline and I’m also calling a massive decline. We saw pricing get cut in half in 2008. Is there going to be a pullback of 10%? There should be. I don’t derstand how the markets kept going up the last 12 months, but I think it’s going to be a different seller, different game, and no matter what, there will be some sort of pain in there. It really just comes down to that fear. And it’s almost not even just fear, it’s fomo, fear of missing out on your equity. They feel rich, they have all this equity and if it starts declining, they’re going, I’m not rich anymore and it’ll be more FOMO than anything else. I need to get this equity before it’s gone. And that’s where there’s opportities. So

Dave:
James, if you think there might be a pullback, what drives that pullback in your mind? Jay is told us he thinks it’s fear. Is there something else you think that could cause the market to retract?

James:
Yeah, I think it’s just rning out of gas. I mean people, they made so much money the last two to three years you could buy anything and it was going to be worth more. I even sold my boat for more money than I have bought it for three years.

Dave:
You’re the first person to ever make money on a boat.

James:
Well, it will catch up to me when I sell this next boat for

Dave:
Sure. It all comes arod.

James:
And so it’s just a lack of liquidity and a lack of payments. And so what we did see, and I think this is why we’re seeing the results now, I think in April it was the first time we saw people’s savings accots dip below pre pandemic. I think it was the end of April that came out and people had a lot of money in the bank. They were kind of living off of it. And that’s where we’re seeing the tightening. You are not seeing cars, boats, your luxury goods have slowed down and I think it comes down to liquidity and affordability and people don’t want to lock into a heavy payment when they’re certain about the market. And that’s what I think is going to cause the delays in sales and bring pricing down. It’s going to come down to are you a seller with a level head?

James:
When I didn’t sell this house for 90 days at four and a half million bucks and I’m paying $25,000 a month in payments, you have to be levelheaded and I was levelheaded because that’s what the home was worth. Now some people would go the opposite direction if they’re rning on fumes, that lack of liquidity and that lack of reserves is why people make bad decisions. Then they’ll start cutting price that starts crashing the market down and then buyers start to see that and they will resurface too. So when the buyers think there’s an opportity, they hear a hint of good news, they rush back into the market. And so I mean the major issues are going to be lack of affordability, lack of liquidity, but also guess what, when we go into a recession, rates should fall too, which is going to make things more affordable. And so there is going to be a balance in that mixture and I think that’s the main difference between 2008 and today.

Dave:
Well said. I do think you see that in the data too, like savings accots, they’re declining. People are using up a lot of the money that they have and that can definitely contribute to a decline. I also want to just call out the fact that there’s just a huge amot of geopolitical instability right now, and I don’t know if you call it a black swan event because they’re inherently knowable, but I just think the risk of something crazy happening on a global scale is probably higher than it’s been at most points in my lifetime. And you never know what’s going to happen there. So that could certainly impact housing, although it’s almost impossible to forecast what that would be and what it would mean for investors. But I think it’s just the certainty is higher than it normally is, at least in my opinion. So given these things the potential of fear or rning out of gas or some black swan event, I guess the question is we talk a lot about what to do in today’s environment, but I’m curious to get both of your advice on what to do if there is a retraction, if there is a crash, and this may not even be on a national level, this may be localized in your specific market that there may be a crash.

Dave:
Jay, what would you do if you saw, let’s say a 10% decline in the market?

J:
So one thing that has been true in every market over again, the last 150, 160 years is that real estate goes up in value. And there’s been no 10 year period in the last a hdred and however many years where we’ve seen real estate not go up in value nationwide on a national level. And so again, from my perspective, the best predictor of the future is the past. And if you assume that that is a good metric, then over any given 10 year period, you’re going to be happy that you bought real estate. So if there’s a 10% decline, I think that gives us the opportity if you can find deals that are cash flowing with conservative derwriting. I think anybody that heard what James was saying about packing a proforma needs to go back and listen to that because that is super important. It’s really important that we be conservative and we use historic data, even conservative historic data as opposed to assuming that what’s happened over the last two or three years or even the last 10 years is going to happen again because it’s likely to happen again.

J:
But use historic data and model out your deals and if you find deals that will cash flow that you’re not at risk of rning into issues over the next five or 10 years, you can be pretty certain that 10 years from now those properties, you’re going to be glad you bought them. And so yeah, I see every percentage point drop in values, every percentage point drop in mortgage rates as being additional opportity. And I think real estate investors should instead of being fearful, because again, I remember back in 2008 and the number of people I talked to today that say, wow, I wish I would’ve just pulled the trigger in 2000 10, 11, 12, but I was too scared to do so. We’ll be looking back in 10 years and fortately there’ll be people saying the same thing. Don’t be one of those people.

James:
Well, because there’s always the overcorrection when there’s any shift like Jay was talking about, the fear ramps up and there’s the over dip and one thing I’ve learned is when I get cold feet, I’m like, oh, this is going to suck because it will no matter what as an investor, if you go through a market cycle, which you will, and if you don’t think you will, you should not be doing this. But what I’ve learned is when I get cold feet and I stop for a second going, oh man, this is going to hurt for a second. You have to keep buying because you buy through that over dip through the correction when rates shot up and almost drastically we took a major hit. I mean I’m talking six figure lost over 350 grand in a six month period. That sucks. That is not great for anybody.

James:
But the thing that we did right is I was looking at value. I’m going, wow, there’s good pricing on things right now and we kept buying. We were able to make up that loss in six months by buying those deals. Now I would not be able to make up those loss if I was buying right now because the deals aren’t as good as they were when it overcorrected. And so those are things that you always want to do is going, what is my core business? What is value? I don’t want to get trapped on the numbers. Mike go, am I buying good value? Am I buying below replacement costs? Am I buying below pricing that I saw three years ago? That’s the thing I learned most that 2008 for all the investors out there is keep a reserve bank. You have to have liquidity to grind through these events and if you have liquidity to grind through the events, it also allows you to keep buying to make up those losses in a very short amot of time.

J:
And here’s another thing to think about. Anybody that was investing three, four years ago, I wrote a Facebook post three years ago where interest rates were down arod, well, interest rates were at 0%, mortgage rates were like at three, three and a quarter percent, and I wrote a Facebook post that basically said, buying real estate today, the asset isn’t the real estate. Real estate was already a little bit overpriced at that point. The real asset is the loan. Getting a loan at three, four, even 5% is a tremendous asset in and of itself, even if the derlying real estate kind of stays flat for a period of time. And the reason for that is because having debt in an inflationary environment when we have high inflation, having debt is a tremendous benefit to the person that has that debt because you’re paying off that debt in inflated dollars, you’re paying off that debt in dollars that are worth less money in the future, and I suspect that over the next six months, there’s a reasonable chance that the fed over corrects with their cutting of rates. I think rates are going to be lower than the historic average within six to 12 months, and I think there’s going to be another great opportity for real estate investors to leverage relatively cheap debt and within a likely inflationary environment over the next five to 10 years, that debt’s going to be even more valuable.

Dave:
That’s a great point and one of the most valuable parts of owning real estate is just locking in that lower debt and paying it down over time. It is as safe of a return as you can get. I think out there. Jay, one of the interesting dynamics in the 2008 market that I’m curious your opinion on is that credit got a lot harder. So we had this situation where prices went down, but it wasn’t as easy for someone who might’ve said, Hey, this is a buying opportity to jump back in because it’s really tough to get a loan. As James said, there’s always an overcorrection. Loans were super easy to get and then they were super hard to get. Do you think if the market goes down now, we might see a situation where prices go down and credit actually gets easier to get if rates are coming down? What do you make of that?

J:
I’m not sure I agree. I mean, I’ve been through a couple of these cycles and we always seem to think that when lending is good and the markets are wide open, it feels like it’s going to stay that way forever. And we always make excuses for why we’re never going to get in a situation where lending gets really tight. But historically, when there’s a lot of fear in the market, again, let’s go back to a fear graph. When fear is arod a one or a two or a three, lending is wide open. It’s up high, and as you move across that fear graph, you basically see a linear line down in terms of lender willingness and ability to lend. And so as you get towards 8, 9, 10 in fear, lending basically dries up hopeful, and I’m relatively confident at this point that we’re not going to see a 2008 type event that we could get to a typical recession where we see fear kind of in that to make up numbers 4, 5, 6 range.

J:
And I think the 4, 5, 6 range on fear is an amazing opportity for investors because typically you’re going to see a lot of transactions in that range. You’re going to see lending still relatively loose in that range. You’re going to see values still relatively strong in that range. There’s enough demand out there that I don’t think that even with transaction volume doubling or tripling that we’re going to see values drop. I think that this is going to end up being a good recession if there is one of those things for us as real estate investors because I think it’s going to give us a lot of benefits without the drawbacks of something as bad as 2008.

James:
Well, and I think the thing for everyone to keep in mind, rates will come down, but that doesn’t mean banks want to lend it to you. And when you go through transitionary markets, I don’t even call ’em recessions, I call ’em transitionary markets. We’re just going into something different and you just want to build the right toolkit for yourself. What is the toolkit? It’s resources when money’s hard to get, you want to go meet with every type of bank, hard money, soft money, local business banks, big banks, because as fear like Jay keeps mentioning, creeps up, it hits your suppliers, it hits your contractors, it hits your lending in your banking, and you have to have access to liquidity and that is what we’ve been working on for the last 12 to 24 months because we have to stay ahead of it. And if you want to maximize a transitionary market, you have to have financing. And it doesn’t mean the financing won’t be there, but you got to pick up the rocks and find out who will lend it to you, and if you have that in your corner, you are golden during these ages.

Dave:
That’s such good advice. Are there other parts of this toolkit that you think investors should be building out right

James:
Now? Yeah, I mean the things that you want. What are we looking for during a recession market? Well, we need financing. So the banking, like I just talked about, we need access to quick liquidity outside regular banks. We want to make sure that our hard money lenders, our private lenders are still there. If my private lenders are getting nervous, then we’re going to sit down and talk about why they’re nervous, where they’re going to put their money and should they be putting it elsewhere or should they keep it with us. We’ll have those conversations and we have those conversations today, and I think that’s important because we’re having ’em today because they know what our mindset is going forward, not that we’re being irrational with the purchasing. Then other things that you want to build up because you got to have your deal flow. I spent a lot of time on the phone with these yog guys because I now became the old guy in my market.

James:
The yog guys that are out finding the deals, and we’re not even buying from them now, but I know I’ll be buying from them in six months and they will be selling me everything at that point because the buyers go away. You want to make sure that your contractors and your resources are not just available because when you go to recession, they will be available, I promise you that, but you need the right guys because if you hire that wrong contractor in a time when things are going down and then they walk away with your money, you’re getting double popped. And so it’s all about building those core resources that you need, right? If you have a property manager right now that’s not quite hitting your quotas and not meeting your expectations, swap them out. Now. You don’t want to be doing that when the market cools down. You want to be proactive right now, not reactive.

Dave:
Great advice from both of you, James and Jay, thank you so much for joining the podcast. If any of your listeners want to connect with these veterans, excellent investors, we will make sure to put their contact information in the show notes. You can of course connect with them on biggerpockets.com and see what they’re up to over there. Jane James, thank you so much. Appreciate you being here. Thanks, Dave.

James:
Thanks guys.

Dave:
On The Market was created by me, Dave Meyer and Kaylin Bennett. The show is produced by Kaylin Bennett, with editing by Exodus Media. Copywriting is by Calico content, and we want to extend a big thank you to everyone at BiggerPockets for making this show possible.